|
Post by Kwan Yu on Mar 12, 2008 8:58:18 GMT -5
Capitalist argument: Survival of fittest good for business Government protection bad for economy
Jungle law passe Man no longer monkey Everyman go hunting soon everything dead
Mass protection good for ecology Mass protection good for economy
Capitalism immoral policy Benefit only few or soon everything dead
|
|
|
Post by Trivium515 on Mar 15, 2008 19:09:58 GMT -5
This makes a lot of sense to me. If one looks at nature and how people must work together in a group or tribe just to simply survive, with everyone having their own duties to do, some have to hunt, some have to gather, some have to look after the young, some have to take care of the camp, so that it all comes together and life can be maintained... is it just that we've become spoiled and so we've decided we can leave the tribe and make it on our own? I think a trip back into nature to bring us down to earth is needed, to bring us back to that unity of family again, all working toward a common goal. If all the world operated like this, what we could accomplish then seems to stretch as far as the imagination.
|
|
soulatom
Apprentice
P-G Angel ~ R.I.P.
Posts: 87
|
Post by soulatom on Mar 18, 2008 19:23:29 GMT -5
Jungle law passe Man no longer monkey Everyman go hunting soon everything dead Capitalism immoral policy Benefit only few or soon everything dead Capitalism vaulted us into the age of technology and advantage that we now sustain and take for granted in the western world.....which isn't necessarily a bad thing, right? But as you say it has served it's purpose and we now need to move into the next evolutionary step. I don't think that anyone in the developed world can't see the writing on the wall for the necessity of change how we administer the result of capitalism. This is not my best subject but I think we need to explore how to move to the next stage.
|
|
|
Post by Kwan Yu on Mar 27, 2008 17:12:45 GMT -5
Moral Dilemma.
The cost of the car license for a rich man in a Rolls to drive down a highway built by a poor man who cannot afford a car
|
|
piper
Apprentice
Posts: 84
|
Post by piper on Mar 27, 2008 19:33:18 GMT -5
Yes huge moral dilemma in all apects of life between rich and poor. Just the idea that we have rich and poor and not equality.
I can't wrap my pea brain around the middle ground here. I just heard that India who is about to explode exponentially in its population has just come out with a revolutionary little two cylinder car that seats 2 people. Cool right? Buth the thing is that it has no smog thingy's on it and with everyone in India owning one we will all be dead from the emissions of the cute little buggers in no time.
Then again some self indulgent rich cat tootling down the road in a Rolls which most of the likes of us will never even see the inside of.........hows that workin for us.
One planet, one family....
|
|
|
Post by Trivium515 on Apr 1, 2008 14:31:36 GMT -5
One planet, one family.... I like this alot. Should be a sigy. if only we all could just train ourselves to think of that every time we do something (or don't do something) that will not only effect ourselves, but others as well...
|
|
fay
Global Steward
Posts: 100
|
Post by fay on Apr 9, 2008 13:05:01 GMT -5
yes , it would be nice if we trained our selves to think how our actions will hurt us, others and the environment.
capitalism is pure evil.
|
|
|
Post by Kwan Yu on Apr 17, 2008 0:28:38 GMT -5
Freedom Fraternity Equality not Capitalist slogan
|
|
fay
Global Steward
Posts: 100
|
Post by fay on May 4, 2008 11:09:31 GMT -5
that would be correct, oh wise one.
|
|
|
Post by lavender1 on Oct 3, 2009 20:57:06 GMT -5
and how are we doing today, each single one of us? fine, thank you?
|
|